Papa Bear you are smoking CRACK if you think for one minute that Kawasaki does not CARE about us! If they didnt care then they would tell everyone to go F themselves by not making another SXS and just saying to hell with trying to do anything for our sport in terms of saving it.
Are any of you blind to what Jeff Knoll just posted or to what I just said about the MANUFACTURERS trying to SAVE THIS SPORT? Are you guys so self centered that you can't for one minute put yourselves in their shoes? Do you not realize that the manufacturers by trying to make whats already been in their USER MANUALS for years law because all of the ambulance chasing lawyers are trying to ruin this sport?
EVERY MANUFACTURER INVOLVED IN ROHVA SUPPORTED THIS!!!!!! Can everyone see that??? ROHVA spoke on behalf of all of them, who cares if Kawasaki was in attendance, who cares if Kawasakis name is on the bill, ROHVA is on the bill and they represent EVERYONE!!!!!!!
Geez guys... IN case you missed what Jeff Knoll just said, and what we have tried to convey many times in this thread and in conversation - "Keep in mind that the Consumer Products Safety Commission is looking for an outright ban on this type of vehicle."
If we don't bend to allow certain rules to be put in place we risk the CPSC to enact a law or rules that would force manufacturers to build UTV's in a way that NONE OF US WOULD WANT TO DRIVE THEM thus forcing manufacturers to just say the hell with it and go the route of the ATC. Again, we may need to lose an arm to save the body. Wearing a helmet or saying no more bench seats bolted into a bed may just be something we need to deal with.
I am not saying I like this law, but I like this law WAY more than I like not have any UTVs or any more business in this sport. Kawasaki is VERY much for all of us as enthusiasts, as is Polaris, Arctic Cat, Can-Am, John Deere, Yamaha, Honda, etc etc.. If they weren't then why would they even be putting this law in place? They want to continue building and selling machines for ALL OF US TO ENJOY. If they feel they need to implement rules to help protect themselves from the CPSC and from dirty whore lawyers then we should consider supporting them in that. Then again, if wearing a helmet is the friggen end of the world to you then I guess you need to do what you can to fight that?
As for why manufacturers don't put Harnesses in a UTV. Its simple, the minute they do that is the minute they admit that the machines are dangerous enough to need them which means that the dirty whore lawyers can have another bit of ammo in suing them. Its BS, they know it, we know it but LAWYERS will do what they can to make a buck. They are the ones that could give 2 shits about any of you or me or my family. They care about MONEY!
There is way to much money in this sport for Kawasaki to say "F" it. That is why they are here, its for profit and their is nothing wrong with that.
Save this sport? If they want to save it, lets start saving the land. Without that we dont need to buy their vehicles. I dont see the UTV market being the next ATC issue. I dont see the Fed's banning UTV's.
Google Ken Glaser trademarks. He is an attorney who makes his living creating corporations (12 of them so far in just a few years) positioned to collect "sponsorships" from manufacturers. He is who started ROHVA. He takes sponsorship money, puts each manufacture on his board and he then write laws to protect his sponsors I mean clients!
BTW not every manufacture is part of ROHVA. Honda is not involved with the racket!
Maybe we can bend, but when you ban the use of previous models and years of UTV' s that were out before the invention of the factory 4 seat UTV and before this law then that is not bending. That is bending over and taking it!
Maybe they should have considered making the law effect 2013 and beyond models. Grandfather 2012 models and not effectively make these vehicles worth pennies on the dollar. Not make 65% of current UTV's used in California illegal. If families cant use their UTV then how much money will not be spent in the local desert area economy? How much does the Imperial Valley count of the winter time desert tourist to bring revenue into their city's and into California from out of state tourist coming to our deserts and sand dunes?
Maybe make the helmet law for people under 16 years of age? But how can you justify making all UTV people wear a helmet when a 500 hp buggy's with twice the wheel travel capable of going 100+ mph dont have any helmet laws.
So the manufactures are more worried of a lawyer suing them for adding doors and real harnesses vs selling a product that is truly safe. Heck Polaris seatbelts have a bungy cord type of attachment to let the seatbelt have some give! What the heck is that! We all have learned that give like that is what causes back and neck injuries.
Once again their own Org ROHVA is run by a Lawyer!