Trust me its pretty easy to manipulate dyno numbers. But I will say a well built queen motor built will do good but the desert usually is the biggest factor.
FAnd turbo vs NA truly means nothing. It shouldn't be called desert racing, it should be called minimizing parts failures and mistakes throughout the day. That's all it boils down to.
"..desert racing boils down to the least parts failures or mistakes.."
Like somebody said once...'smoke and mirrors'.
Everybody is currently arguing the new xp motor
with the full realization that it will indeed be everything
but that wins a desert race between two identically looking (exterior) bone stock cars in the same production class from the same (leading by a mile) manufacturer.
I seem to remember BadAssMav (on another thread) simply being honest enough to describe the
entire 'pre' turbo driveline system in no uncertain terms. It is
junk. Everybody on here who has ever owned an XP made previously or has certainly raced this machine knows full well that this is a fact. Will the motor-forward improvements that were
forced with the introduction of the Turbo (now we know why the factory was silent as to these blatant engineering-related shortcomings all along) be integrated to N/A models(?)...who knows. We do know that at least Johnny
finished strong with only the same overheating problems that everybody else is having right now.
A good number of us out here since the dawn of this sport have been wasting
a lot of money over the years hoping that at least
one company would someday assemble enough brains together to build a half-way passable 'sport'-based cvt drivetrain system.
Most of them haven't even been able to handle a 21st century 'intake air system' (deja vu 'apparently' in 2016 if the problem isn't internal) even belt cooling system a good share of the time.
'Now'... everybody's arguing that it's all about
the motor...as if they
wouldn't choose to race a properly engineered 2016 XP
even 'neutered' (modified to produce the same or even
less horsepower)
over the previous pieces of garbage (engineering/lightly built-wise) sitting right next to it
presently on showroom floors..
IF playing Frankenstein with unlimited budgets wasn't so common in (cough) 'production' classes.
These pre-2016 XPs argued about presently will soon be akin to the same pieces of crap that GM produced in the 80's and everybody who owns or races one knows it.
To argue the Turbo improvements over everything else that Polaris has attempted to (now) 'just
get you there' vs 'being there first' (which is a mute point when ignoring the former) is missing the ridiculousness of the following:
"We'll just paint lipstick on these pre-Turbo pigs and cram literally everything but the motor in to a 'united' (cough) 100% 'even' class..and call it good..." (for now).