paulk
Member
saw this and thought id share
http://news.utvguide.net/2013/12/polaris-files-complaint-for-patent.html
http://news.utvguide.net/2013/12/polaris-files-complaint-for-patent.html
it sad there going to go after them for that. the money they are going to spend in court they could put into R&D and make a better 50" trail rig if thats truly why they are filling on. don't remember harley suing all the polaris or all the other v-twin copies.
Polaris didnt buy the rights to indian till the last few years and indian hasnt used their own engine since they first went under in the 40's or 50's. The last run used s&s engine which are harley based aftermarket engines. I could understand suing if there were a more specific patent but its like Ferrari suing lamborguino or any other mid engine car builder for that matter. Patent are to protect specific designs, part, or product not a generitc description.Ummm HD didn't invent the V-twin. Indian (which is owned by Polaris) had a v-twin three years before HD and yet Indian didn't invent the v-twin either. HD thus doesn't have any intellectual property to protect in your example. Polaris does have I.P. to protect, and if you don't actively work to protect your trademarks, patents and copyrights...effectively you lose them. Polaris 'ownes' this patent, which was filed something like seven years ago and was granted just this month due to a the P.T.O. being so far behind. So the question is, if someone takes or uses something that you own it is called what?
Polaris didnt buy the rights to indian till the last few years and indian hasnt used their own engine since they first went under in the 40's or 50's. The last run used s&s engine which are harley based aftermarket engines. I could understand suing if there were a more specific patent but its like Ferrari suing lamborguino or any other mid engine car builder for that matter. Patent are to protect specific designs, part, or product not a generitc description.