SCORE UTV Rules.

NIKAL

Well-Known Member
I was looking over the Score UTV rule book for both N/A & Turbo classes and notice the Max tire size is 33 inches! That is awesome that Score got it right, with no outside influences or pressures from sponsors.

Will anyone be running a 33 inch tire at the Baja 500 in June? There are some awesome, race proven, light 33 inch tires that would be great on a UTV. Who's the first?
 
Light and 33" dont go together. I'm not so sure some of the tranny and axle problems we have seen as of Late is from running 32"s.
 
Light and 33" dont go together. I'm not so sure some of the tranny and axle problems we have seen as of Late is from running 32"s.

I would guess the two limited buggy tires that I'm thinking of are lighter then the current crop of 32's that have come out. Plus I think the wheel packages teams are choosing is is another big factor in rotational mass and un-sprung weight.

Look at the BFG tires.The 37 inch project is the same weight as the 39 due to construction and no liner. BFG's 39 is also WAY lighter then the 37 inch General Grabber. The new 35" BFG KR2 buggy tire is much lighter then the 33"inch BFG Baja TA due to design & construction of the tire. BFG is discontinuing the 39" Project and is releasing the 40" KR2 which is built off the 37" tire they built under the Michelin brand for Dakar. This tire is 1 inch taller, yet had no weight change. Rob Mac, Menzies & Voss were running this new tire at the Mint. Lofton just tested the new tire this last week and will run them at Laughlin.

Regarding axles, I think much of that is due to lack of knowledge of axles & CV's in the class, and the e-mails & pm's I have received seem to prove that. Only a few seem to really understand axles & CV's and are not just buying what they are told will work for their kit and bolting them up. More teams need to dive into learning and actually measuring what they are using, and what they need, only then will you see some of these axles issues go away.

Same with the trans issues. It could be the tire size, but it could be lack of maintenance or knowledge. 3 of the 4 broken trans that I heard or saw at the Mint were all still running 30's, Barnett's was the only trans I heard of that was on 32's. Two of those 4 were on BFG's, not saying that is the issue, just an observation. Also I believe there was a mix of Turbo & N/A cars with trans issues. Also as teams chose to make bigger stiffer axles, I think you will see more trans failures as all you are doing is moving the shock load to the next weakest link.
 
ultra cross 32" weight 39.6. ultra cross 30" weight 30.34. BFG 30" weight 37lbs. yokohama dirt digger 33" weight 37.1. The wheel would be the deciding factor on which way to go.
 
I would guess the two limited buggy tires that I'm thinking of are lighter then the current crop of 32's that have come out. Plus I think the wheel packages teams are choosing is is another big factor in rotational mass and un-sprung weight.

Look at the BFG tires.The 37 inch project is the same weight as the 39 due to construction and no liner. BFG's 39 is also WAY lighter then the 37 inch General Grabber. The new 35" BFG KR2 buggy tire is much lighter then the 33"inch BFG Baja TA due to design & construction of the tire. BFG is discontinuing the 39" Project and is releasing the 40" KR2 which is built off the 37" tire they built under the Michelin brand for Dakar. This tire is 1 inch taller, yet had no weight change. Rob Mac, Menzies & Voss were running this new tire at the Mint. Lofton just tested the new tire this last week and will run them at Laughlin.

Regarding axles, I think much of that is due to lack of knowledge of axles & CV's in the class, and the e-mails & pm's I have received seem to prove that. Only a few seem to really understand axles & CV's and are not just buying what they are told will work for their kit and bolting them up. More teams need to dive into learning and actually measuring what they are using, and what they need, only then will you see some of these axles issues go away.

Same with the trans issues. It could be the tire size, but it could be lack of maintenance or knowledge. 3 of the 4 broken trans that I heard or saw at the Mint were all still running 30's, Barnett's was the only trans I heard of that was on 32's. Two of those 4 were on BFG's, not saying that is the issue, just an observation. Also I believe there was a mix of Turbo & N/A cars with trans issues. Also as teams chose to make bigger stiffer axles, I think you will see more trans failures as all you are doing is moving the shock load to the next weakest link.


Possibly....Im just speculating the tire. One of the racers we work with went to a new 32 and he has lost a tranny already this season and had axle issues at the mint. we have tested 32's on our Pre Runner and not had issues...but my argument is always to the tone of "was it ran at race pace" The only way for us to really find out is run 32's at which I have mixed emotions. I'm not convinced the pro's outweigh the con's.

Everyone else that I keep my eye on has also stepped up to the turbo that brings its own set of new problems.

Some of the Buggy tires could be lighter than UTV tires.
 
Are they still running the cheap Chinese bearings in the transmission? Even the new Turbo cars still have the same crap Chinese bearings that have been failing for years.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
 
Are they still running the cheap Chinese bearings in the transmission? Even the new Turbo cars still have the same crap Chinese bearings that have been failing for years.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
Makes you wonder are bearing failing or gears breaking or are they still blowing out seal?
 
I haven't seen any bearings fail once they have been changed to Nachi bearings. I know a guy that runs a small shop and changes the bearing in the transmission in a rzr probably once a week. Lots of bearing failures from the Peer bearings.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
 
Those 33" Yokohamas just look like they belong on a ute. I know their sidewalls couldn't be near as durable as the 8 ply rated sidewalls of the itp's that Marc's been running. We would race on used tires with the itp's because the new ones provided too much traction, and Marc couldn't slide the car how he wanted to at high speeds, and they seemed to be harder on the belts when new. 200-300 mile old tires at 18-20 psi was the ticket for us on 30" black waters.
 
ultra cross 32" weight 39.6. ultra cross 30" weight 30.34. BFG 30" weight 37lbs. yokohama dirt digger 33" weight 37.1. The wheel would be the deciding factor on which way to go.

I believe the 30" Ultracross weighs about 34 lbs. Theres a Utube vid of Yoko Super Digger 33" that's not impressive at all for a long Baja Race. I almost forgot.....bite me Jim..:)
 
Those 33" Yokohamas just look like they belong on a ute. I know their sidewalls couldn't be near as durable as the 8 ply rated sidewalls of the itp's that Marc's been running. We would race on used tires with the itp's because the new ones provided too much traction, and Marc couldn't slide the car how he wanted to at high speeds, and they seemed to be harder on the belts when new. 200-300 mile old tires at 18-20 psi was the ticket for us on 30" black waters.

Yeah I'm sure was the case with Blackwaters. That's a mud tire imo. I have a set and nothing stable about them on hard pack. The knobs are like 1" tall.
 
I went back over some old notes I would keep. The Yokohama Super Digger 3 tire I showed weighed mid 36 lbs. I also had specs on the Mickey Thompson Baja Pro weighing 37 lbs. The Yokohama Traction Service front tire was a 7.00-15 (31 inches) and weighed 33 lbs, but after shaving the edge knobbies the tire was 30-31 lbs. We ran the Centerline spun aluminum wheel, the rears were 15x6 (11 lbs) and the fronts 15x3.5 (10 lbs).



Those 33" Yokohamas just look like they belong on a ute. I know their sidewalls couldn't be near as durable as the 8 ply rated sidewalls of the itp's that Marc's been running. We would race on used tires with the itp's because the new ones provided too much traction, and Marc couldn't slide the car how he wanted to at high speeds, and they seemed to be harder on the belts when new. 200-300 mile old tires at 18-20 psi was the ticket for us on 30" black waters.

In all my years running the Super Digger, sidewalls were never an issue, sure we had some flats, but the sidewalls were never torn open, plus running a tube means you are not depending on the tire to keep you inflated. I wish I had some old pictures to show how folded over and bent up we have had some wheels, yet the tire never went flat and stayed on the wheel. One time in the rock garden I got a flat and had to drive threw it with no place to pull over. the wheel was so bent all the way around I almost could not get one of the lugs off! In most cases we could send the wheels to Eddco/U.S Wheel or Ramerio's and we could get the wheel straitened and polished and run that wheel over & over. Only a few times was a wheel scrapped, unlike a cast wheel, where 1 bend or crack it was junk.

Also the idea of Marc running worn tires makes perfect sense. When racing class 10 we ran the BFG Baja TA and we would take brand new tires over to Parkhouse Tire to have them shave 1/2 the tread off and buff the edges to round the tire and to reduce side bite. Wheel spin in many cases is a huge advantage, as it reduces shock load to the drivetrain as you skip over the tops of the bumps, lightens the tire and reduces engine bog in sand,silt and just allowed the engine to stay in the power band better. This is another reason why the Yokohama is such a good tire in the limited buggy classes. We had to alter the BFG to do what the Yokohama was doing right off the shelf.

Reid do you remember the 35" Super Digger 3? That was such an awesome tire. It was a shame when Yokohama stopped producing that tire. It was heaver and ran a harder compound, but it was designed for higher HP buggy's & trucks. Remember when Ivan ran the Yoko's on the PPI TT? A few years back some guys went searching for the molds as they were willing and had the funds to buy them from Yokohama. It was later found that Yokohama scrapped those tire molds and destroyed the docs that had all the rubber compound formula's.


I believe the 30" Ultracross weighs about 34 lbs. Theres a Utube vid of Yoko Super Digger 33" that's not impressive at all for a long Baja Race.

George I could show you video's or pictures of every tire out there that does not look impressive after a race. At the Mint the TT guys would change rear tires on every lap when they fueled. Did you see how bad those tires looked? You cant take one video, and say this tire was not impressive. How many miles were on the tire? What HP did the vehicle have? What air pressure did they run? You yourself learned about low air pressure on the Tensor's and those tires should be able to handle low pressure, being that they are steal belted and with how stiff & heavy they are.

I know guys who could race 500 miles on a Yoko and finish with 1/3 tread left and then there were others who could not do 500 miles on any brand of tire. Also you want a tire that wears, if not you are running to hard of a compound and are actually losing traction and gaining weight in most cases. My teams strategy was to put new rear tires on at the driver change, so a fresh driver started with fresh rear rubber. Also any time we pitted and saw potential issues with the wheel or tire, it was change. You should be able to change two rear tires in about the same time as it takes to fill your fuel cell. So their is no down time to changing a questionable tire.

We raced the Baja 1000 on two sets of rear Super Diggers, each driver got a fresh set. Both sets still had plenty of tread left after there run.

BTW in the past I have got paid consulting fee's for what I'm giving some of you for free. LOL!
 
I was wondering if you ran a inner tube on your tires Nikal. I would say ultra cross is close to rubber compound but the super digger is still softer. Only thing that would scar me is side wall, ultra cross 8 ply and super digger 6ply bias
 
We are running the 32" STI Chicane again. If it can take San Felipe we will be fine for the 500... Curious if anyone is going 33"... Haven't read all, but seems like people are sticking with their known good rubber...
 
I haven't seen any bearings fail once they have been changed to Nachi bearings. I know a guy that runs a small shop and changes the bearing in the transmission in a rzr probably once a week. Lots of bearing failures from the Peer bearings.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
I know that Marc runs the fancy schmancy ceramic bearings throughout his tranny. I believe he said it costs him nearly 3k to upgrade his tranny bearings. Didn't really pay off for him at the mint, as the output shaft bearings to the rear inner stubs let him down. He does run the RCV axles, for what it's worth.
 
I know that Marc runs the fancy schmancy ceramic bearings throughout his tranny. I believe he said it costs him nearly 3k to upgrade his tranny bearings. Didn't really pay off for him at the mint, as the output shaft bearings to the rear inner stubs let him down. He does run the RCV axles, for what it's worth.

Same thing happened to mine w ceramic. Maybe with a clutch brace to take some of the load off might work but after only 200 miles I went a different route and no problems. I don't run AGL anymore either.
 
Ceramic bearings won't last in a Polaris trans. They will not take any kind of debris running through them before they explode.
 
To complete the info I shared on Marcs bearings, his crew chief just told me they believe the axle seals popped out of the tranny first, exposing the bearings to the elements. You mean to tell me that they still run those "easy out" seals in the tranny? I remember constantly pounding those things back in with a dead blow every time I saw them creeping. I was going to tap into the case and install a simple retaining ring into the side, but never had the time. Marc said that he can feel the acceleration difference and sees higher top end speeds with the ceramics. But, if they're that sensitive to particulate contamination, I would choose not to run 'em.
 
To do justice you would have to test two transmissions in the same car on the same road going in the same direction starting from the same spot on the same day with the wind.....yes the same. I don't think the difference is noticeably substantial. Not saying none just not sure it's a lot compared to higher quality steel bearings and definitely more fragile
 

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
17,313
Messages
179,416
Members
12,155
Latest member
dhakdhaki
Back
Top