hardcharger81
New Member
Welp... Seeing this pretty much makes me want to give up on racing my Mav. Certainly a top notch build.
Sorry to hear it guys. Even though I rape on you, I never find happiness in someone elses hardships. Did you at least get some real time miles in before expiring? Better now, than the start of next season.It looks like the guys didn't get enough time tuning the engine. They had to pull out of the race early
Welp... Seeing this pretty much makes me want to give up on racing my Mav. Certainly a top notch build.
I wonder what the strategically placed monster can is for? Is it an overflow catch can?
C'mon guys, play by the rules. Looks like the rear bump steer kicked your arse.
I may still draw with crayons, but this is as big of a red flag as I have seen in some time.
By a mile. They should be located in front of the axles after stretching the rear. The stock pivot location is in line with the rear most a arm pivots. In fact, they share the same bracket. I worked hard to make ours work in the stock location. Unless SCORE and BITD approved this layout prior to fabtime, there may be rough waters ahead for Avid's new car.Reid I don't know Can Am suspension points, but I'm assuming your saying they moved thier inner rear link pivot points?
And perhaps it has been approved. I just want to make sure they are in the field, and legal.Wow! Not even close. I believe this car already raced one BITD race. I would suspect BITD Tech has inspected this car and would have seen such a blatant change in the rear suspension pivot point. Plus since the Tech Director races this same manufacture, he should know this model very well.
It didn't race Henderson
Changing the tie rod mounting in the front is ok so I see no reason this should be an issue.[It is a fixed pivot link, not a dynamic steering link. The rules say that all suspension pivoting points must remain stock.