In viewing the catalog, I was impressed to see that it runs a dry sump system for the motor oil, has a 28 gallon fuel cell ('cause all serious race UTE's should make it at least 100 miles on a tank of gas), and has 210 amps of available electrical power using an engine mounted alternator (freewheeling pulley, I hope. Curious at what vehicle speed the alternator starts putting out, and how much is the initial amperage) The big benefit here is that when you slam on the brakes, the alternator pulley doesn't come to an immediate halt along with the drive train.
Regarding the ass end, I'm not a fan of the lay-mans basic rear swingarm set up. I remember hearing a rep comment in one of the promo videos that in line stability was a factor in going with a rear swingarm that pivots perpendicular to the wheelbase. I would strap the rear suspension to limit the amount of droop. It may mean some minor tweaking on the coil spring rate and/or adjustment, but given the 32" tires and potential HP the motor has, I don't think you want to force too much of a compound angle on the cv's (based on cv joint technology 2 years ago that is. I'm unaware of the current cv tech and durability). 20" of rear wheel travel would still suffice. The swing radius of the rear suspension looks a bit short to allow 22" of vertical wheel travel without compromising cv joint integrity at full droop. Seems I remember reading somewhere that after last years 1000, someone in the know said the rear cv joint/axle set up was in need of further R&D.
The front steer was a given in my mind. Irregardless of the layout in past models, I'm sure RG would've ran a front steer. It's just the right thing to do. I'd suggest steering dampers with the 32" tires. For less than 5 or 6 lbs., it's a small price to pay for durability . By the end of 2018, expect to see the other mfg's follow the front steer example as set here. I also think they nailed the track width at 77", and the WB at 110". For too long the available UTE's were either too short (in the mid 80" range), or too long (in the mid to high100 teens range).
The spec sheet still left me a bit hungry. For $100,000, I'd sure like to know how much the car weighs. In standard trim, and fully loaded. All in all, it's a pretty impressive package. I'm sure the influence of this vehicle will help to keep the wind blowing strong into the sails of UTV desert racing. Now, if they can just refine the politics of regulating these cars, it will go a long way in securing said future.
The CV issue was the stub size where it goes in to the differential was to small and breaking off in the diff. It was a known problem going in to the 1K and a fix was in the works but wasnt done yet.